

Pandey BK, Rajesh S, Chandra S (2020) Numerical evaluation of geogrid-encased stone columns in soft soil under embankment loading. Rajesh S (2017) Time-dependent behaviour of fully and partially penetrated geosynthetic encased stone columns. Gu M, Zhao M, Zhang L, Han J (2016) Effects of geogrid encasement on lateral and vertical deformations of stone columns in model tests. Hosseinpour I, Riccio M, Almeida MSS (2014) Numerical evaluation of a granular column reinforced by geosynthetics using encasement and laminated disks. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):107–120ĭas SK, Bora MC (2013) Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress. Wu C-S, Hong Y-S (2009) Laboratory tests on geosynthetic-encapsulated sand columns. Geotext Geomembr 27(3):167–175Ĭastro J, Sagaseta C (2011) Consolidation and deformation around stone columns: numerical evolution of analytical solution. Gniel J, Bouazza A (2009) Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns. Mckenna JM, Eyre WA, Wolstenholme DR (1975) Performance of an embankment supported by stone columns in soft ground. GSP 136 innovations in grouting and soil improvement, pp 1–11. Raithel M, Kirchner A, Schade C, Leusink E (2005) Foundation of construction on very soft soil with geotextile encased column–state of the art. U.S Department of Transportation-FHA, FHWA/RD-83.Ĭhristoulas ST, Bouckovalas G, Giannaros CH (2000) An experimental study on model stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 49(5):1095–1106īarksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and construction of stone column, vol 1. Pandey BK, Rajesh S, Chandra S (2021) Performance enhancement of encased stone column with conductive natural geotextile under k0 stress condition.

Pandey BK, Rajesh S (2019) Enhanced engineering characteristics of soils by electro-osmotic treatment : an overview. Han J (2015) Research and development of ground column technologies. Hausmann MR (1990) Engineering principles of ground modification. This article summarizes the limitation and discovers the potential opportunities for future research and future collaborations. However, the improvement ratio increases at a rate of 1.6% for every 1% reduction in the length to diameter ratio. The stress concentration ratio decreases at a rate of 0.7–0.8% for every 1% reduction in the length to diameter ratio of the column. The study observed that the displacement method of column installation is most widely used in the field to construct the encased stone column. Further, the study also presents bibliometric network maps to recognize the global research trends based on the publication database. The outcome of the study is presented in terms of the load-transfer mechanism and the evolution of the stress concentration ratio, efficiency in improving the soft clay stresses developed in the encasement and mode of failure. The review aims to recapitulate basic details of the encased stone column (ESC) reinforced soil and enlist the outcomes obtained from the laboratory-based experimental, numerical and analytical studies. This paper presents a systematic review to explore the performance of the soft clay reinforced with an encased stone column.
